Research: Children With Mental Illness Essay

The shoot for of this paper is to critique an term from the subject field Association of affable Workers, Inc. The article selected is titled Child shackles loss among women with determined grievous psychogenic sickness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) I selected this article due to its applicability to child preventive service which is where my field practicum is taking place. The components of this article are clearly delineate and broken imbibe into subheadings as followed Abstract, Introduction, Theoretical Framework and Research Design, Method, Analysis, Results, Discussion, Implications for genial Health Policy and Services, Conclusion, and References. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The layout of the article makes it easy for the reader to follow and sympathise key elements and terms of the question. The title provides a clear cut exposition of what the article is written about as well. The variables are identified and specify under the methods subheading it in any case provides a definition of individual variables, environ psychic variables, and how child custody is defined for the purposes of this search. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The statement of the problem is descriptively explained in the introduction and supported with statistical analysis provided in the look for article. The purpose is clearly defined under the theoretical framework and research protrude particle explaining that the subject field was to test the hypothesis which stated that by researching tarradiddle of child custody loss among women with dangerous persistent mental disease the custody loss would be higher than those women who did non stupefy this causa of illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The hypothesis and research question provide insight into how the antecedent plans to press out a correlation and then build effective policies and interventions based upon this evidence. The research question asks What are the circumstances under which women with severe mental illness over leap custody of their children? (Hollingsworth,2004) This gives the reader a concise question that allows them to forecast the direction of the research itself. The research question is firmly followed by characteristics that grow been observed among the disjointicipants which define what whitethorn have led to a puzzle losing custody of her child.The article then provides examples of behavior patterns and socioeconomic factors that may involve the variables mentioned. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The theoretical framework and research section re-states the purpose of this research and also provides corroboratory information as to why this knowledge is important to recover for the target population mention. The theoretical framework states that the author used the serviceman Ecology Theory, which fits the problem presented because there is enough past information available, and biopsychosocial elements provided to be able to test the hypothesis and provide reliable/measurable dat a. (Hollingsworth, 2004) base upon the information in the article the Human Ecology Theory entrust view the mother with severe persistent mental illness in her environment, assist in predicting outcomes, and also provide measurable data. The data lay in will enable social workers and mental health workers to connect these women and families to the slouch resources so that the mother may regain custody and have adit to the resources that she requires.The variables presented appear to be appropriate for the problem as it has been defined. The individuals biopsychosocial information is measurable including whether there is a history of substance ill-treat and treatment for mental illness. The environmental variables are also measurable by gathering data related to the individuals neighborhood, child behavior, exiguity conditions, and social support. (Hollingsworth, 2004) It is important to mention that each term used in the variables section was further defined and a description was given as to how the information was considered from these separate groups. The author also recognizes that there are factors as well as the mothers mental illness that could play a part in her mental functioning. (Hollingsworth, 2004) I feel that it is important for the author to be intimate these outlying factors that may wreak the data that has been collected.The assumptions make in this article include somewhat bias toward how child protective services and the wakeless(prenominal) system will treat a mother that has persistent severe mental illness. It is not hard to understand why this assumption is made and it is reasonable to undertake that the legal system andchild protective services may assume too much based upon a quick assessment of the mothers mental state. I feel that the secretion based on the research information provided is also related to geographical areas more so than others. If there is a low income area that is lacking(p) access to qualified mental health professionals it would be safe to assume that child protective services would remove the children since other resources are not available. The overall design of this article is constructed around quantitative data with the results of the research existence constructed around this format the author also provides some supportive evidence through qualitative research. The design is appropriate to rooting the research questions and providing an easy to follow guide for the readers to digest the information.In my opinion the author also did a good job recognizing different threats to the validity of the data that was collected. The author did this by recognizing what those threats were and how it was accounted for in the data that was collected, and what impact it may have had on the results. The sample selection was appropriately described and broken down into measurable categories. The author stated Participants were identified from among those enrolled in a National Institute for Mental Illness funded three- cast longitudinal aim of mothers with severe mental illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The author further explains that the sample size began with 379 women after wave 3 of the regard 322 women remained. (Hollingsworth, 2004) Women were removed from the study throughout the study depending upon different variables listed as disqualifiers, such as a mother losing custody of her child/children for less than three months.Some women chose to remove themselves from the study and others lost contact with the individuals conducting the study at different times which in turn made the women disqualified. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The answer of collecting the data is clearly defined under the method section of the article. The author describes the structure of the questionnaire as a 3 wave longitudinal study. (Hollingsworth, 2004) In my opinion the inconsistencies would come from the participant answering truthfully and consistently within the 3 wave study. In the 3 wave study the data was collected initially through structured interview questions, with some open-ended questions used, this is where some of the inconsistencies could be from depending on who was analyzing the answers. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The author stated that a lifehistory calendar was included in the 3rd wave to increase accuracy. (Hollingsworth, 2004) Another consideration would be to note that the participants were paid to enter in the study, but the interview was conducted in the privacy of the participants home. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The interviews were conducted by a trained female interviewer that was racially and ethnically corresponding to that of the participant. (Hollingsworth, 2004) This is note-worthy because it shows some variables that were not stated as having a possible influence on the results of the data collected. I would take into consideration that the interviewer, although professionally trained, may have had biases in favor of the participants that were subconsciously conveyed and could have led the participants to answer the interviewer in a particular manner. The results were able to depict what the variables between the participants that for good lost custody of their children and those that did not lose custody of their children. One provoke finding is that women that were not married were more apparent to permanently lose custody of their children. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The hypothesis for this provided by the author is that the married women more than likely had more immediate support in the home. (Hollingsworth, 2004)One of the variables listed was the behavior problems from the children of women with persistent mental illness the author notes that in order to determine whether this is the children barely reacting to the mothers persistent severe mental illness or whether the children have true behavioral issues needs to be studied further. (Hollingsworth, 2004) With that organism considered the results found that th e childrens behavioral issues had little impact on whether or not the mother lost custody. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The discounts recognized are geared toward mental health policy and services the author states that one part of the study that was initially thought of as an individual variable was actually something that could be considered as an environmental factor as well. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The example given was that individual women may not be discriminated against due to be unmarried and this being the cause for their custody loss, but may have lost custody due to less resources than someone who has a partner.(Hollingsworth, 2004) The second noteworthy implication is that individuals with active symptoms of psychosis or depression can present a prodigious risk to their children, so the children are removed for theirown protection and not due to discriminatory factors.(Hollingsworth, 2004)