Saturday, February 23, 2019

NASA’s Love Triangle Approach

In the processplace, consensual personal activities of individuals al offices affect the working blood in undesirable ways. Often suggest relationships between co-workers emit preferential traversement at its best and sexist acts at its worst. Although Title heptad does non decl atomic number 18 intimate relationships in the body of work as an immoral, un respectable and distasteful act, enough room for distinction often produce a resultant effect when persons argon disadvantage due to a preferential treatment of another.There is a likely for hostility when widespread favoritism exists between male and female employees. In a professional working relationship, the workplace would be ideally unembellished from intimate relationships to prohibit favoritism and thereby banning nepotism. Office romances though are not illegal and discriminatory inclined the increased measure of measure spent together by co-workers giving value to their work. However, work is a serious busi ness and direction requires workers to act rationally small-arm doing their job. This phenomenon should be a cause for concern when personal issues interfere with work-related issues. The m whatsoever-sided love triangle situation between Lisa Nowak, Bill Oefelein and Corlean Shipman threaten the traditional ideas of anti-nepotism and non- fraternisation in the workplace.NASA capitalizes on its military machine man workforce to proffer its interests. Although its government activity code of conduct check to NASAs Shana Dale upon interview (Orlando Sentinel, 2007) do not necessarily insisted regulations that guard and meddle on astronauts and other federal employees personal lives.No matter how we try to justify this explanation for NASAs lapses I continue to insist that American companies have a indwelling desire to keep personal relationships at bay in the workplace in the face of corporate dilemmas over discrimination and harassments. Often management sees that relationshi ps within the company lead to a conflict of interests and inefficiency resulting from spending time and energy on non-work related activities (Avelenda, 1998 691). Under the guise of protecting employees from claims of informal harassment, policies would often widen to informally restrict fraternization and intra-organizational intimate interaction.It was thusly a shock to learn how NASA completely disregarded the personal lives of its employees. Astronauts are usually subjected to stringent rules and equally invasive medical procedures. Nowak no mistrust had undergone extensive medical and psychological examinations if protocols were followed prior and by and by her July 4, 2006 on the STS-121 complaint which included a trip to the International Space Station according to NASA (2006).Her NASA bio declared her as a flight engineer with a caste of captain who logged almost 13 days in space and garnered the delight in as the first Italian American in space. Her confrontation wit h a fellow NASA employee who was reportedly a rival for the affections of another space razz pilot definitely exhibits her gullibility to submit to effects of an unrestrained physical body that is aggravated by strained relationships.NASAs lapses in the face of the current situation involving the triangle love affair of their employees indicated the organizations recent disinterest over interpersonal issues involving their own working family. NASA has forgotten that Nowak at the age 43 and likely at the prime of her life after her shuttle trip last summer may have entangle a bleak end to her career as an astronaut whose piece and third spaceflights would be tough to get after space shuttles are scheduled for retirement in 2010(Orlando Sentinel, Feb.,2007).Bouts of depression are also not uncommon to astronauts who come home and are considered as heroes and overachievers. To recall, Edwin Buzz Aldrin as the second man to step on the moon after Neil Armstrong had alcoholic beve rage problems after their successful return from their mission. NASA has then dismissed the complexities of an unpredictable adult male ruttish response in the face of scientific calculable predictability.In response to Nowaks arrest NASA should review the procedures snarly in their psychological evaluations. The military have been instrumental in submitting their personnel particularly pilots for psychological intervention following extraordinary stress like divorce or deaths in the family (Christian Science Monitor September, 2004). NASA may not have been subservient on this aspect.They may have forgotten how catastrophic consequences are brought around by a human element of error. It would therefore be salutary for NASA and its employees to understand the stress of working in the space program and at least delegate guidance on the personal relationships among its astronauts. Mccurdy (1999) once express that astronauts, like police officers, treat their profession as a wa y of life, not just a job. Despite any self-discipline, astronauts are enjoined to focus on their goals and keep on pursuing such goals which was seen in Nowaks single-minded pursuit against a foe.It would help NASA if it should also establish protocols and policies that treat the grievances of their own personnel. A professional independent body that put forwards proper psychological help and emotional assistance and counseling for its personnel should be make available for its employees. This bodys aim is for the recognition of possible emotional and psychological trauma experience by its key personnel without be used to leverage employment standing in the organization.Any semiofficial involvement into the diagnosis and treatment would alert and divert employee-patients away from the program. Secondly, NASA must(prenominal) also work to regulate workplace fraternizing relationships through a less(prenominal) authoritative disapproval of intra-organizational romance. This woul d be properly implemented when put into create verbally for NASA to be able to eliminate its involvement in the future as an employer liability. Further, when inter-organizational romance and sexual relationships are frowned upon naturally, the well-discipline NASA astronauts would be consistent in their efforts to discontinue from intimate relationships with their co-workers. Another alternative also is for NASA to require employees to report any consensual relationships within its initiation and aftermath through the proper human relations body.In the face of the current scenario between Lisa Nowak, Bill Oefelein and Corlean Shipman, given the organizations growing exposure and in conjunction with being held liable for its apparent disregard for the well-being of its employees I feel that NASA has an ethical and moral responsibility to support Nowak through her misdemeanor and refrain from film her faults and deviant behavior. After all, Bill Oefelein seemingly exercised his d ominion by maintaining devil romantic relationships at the same time with two different women in the same organization thereby causing trouble for both.To restrict this trend, it would parcel out NASA if Oefelein should face a temporary suspension as well. Corlean Shipman is entirely the simple party and ould not benefit any organizing body to involve her in any internal disciplinary measure that Oefelien shall face. Lisa Nowak is already facing unlawful charges and yet, NASA is duty-bound to support her through this ordeal after all it has been tatterdemalion in its duties towards its employees and the whole scientific community and the public.Society must therefore scrutinize the various policies involve in National scientific and military organizations and regulate the intimate relationships of employees within their organization. This is to ensure that employees are not pose in an unnecessary position that requires them to choose between duty and relationship to enhance pr oductivity and protect them from any emotional turmoil.Title VII may not be so keen on fraternization within official work and duty but somehow this has provided an way for harassment and discrimination in the past (Avelenda, 693). NASA as a heavy organization geared towards training personnel for space excellence must also recognize the full potential of allowing people to deal with their emotional problems with the assistance and help of independent human relations services that provide psychological evaluation, treatment and counseling for personnel particularly the ones who are involved in missions.Works CitedWilloughby, Mariano, Cabbage, M., Lundy, S. and Hunt, A. (2007).The Orlando Sentinel. February 7.Avelenda, Saily M. (1998).Comment Love and Marriage in the American workplace Why No-Spouse Policies Dont Work. PA. J. LAB. EMP. 691, 693 .United States. NASA. (2006) Astronaut Biography Lisa Nowak.Accessed 04 April, 2007http//www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/nowak.htmlEditor ial. (2004). Anyone Ever Prepared To devour? Christian Science Monitor Magazine, September 29.McCurdy, Howard. (1999). Space and the American Imagination, sweet ed. Smithsonian.

No comments:

Post a Comment