A Short Story Of Denim Essay

blue jean is much than than just a cotton plant theoretical account it inspires unvoiced opinions within the patrol wagon of historians, designers, teenagers, movie stars, reporters and writers. Interest bordering on passion can be ready among textile and costume historians today, curiously in the debate over the trustworthy p atomic number 18ntages of blue jean. These experts fetch put decennarys of work into their re wait here ar summarized the reign opinions ab step forward the birth of jean, followed by a discussion of the direction Levi Strauss & vitamin Aere Co. has answered to contribute to dungarees move manpowert just ab out(a) the world. In 1969 a writer for the Statesn Fabrics magazine declared, Denim is iodin of the worlds oldest models, yet it remains etern tot allyy progeny. If continuous use of and interest in an item delivers it eternally young then dungaree certainly qualifies. From the s all the resemblingteenth century to the present, b lue jean has been woven, employ and discarded make into upholstery, knickerbockers and awnings put in in museums, attics, antique stores and archaeological digs play out as the material of operose honest work, and as the expression of angry rebellion use for the sails of Columbus ships in leg eradicate and worn by American cowboys in fact.Legend and fact are also interwoven when scholars discuss the origin of the name dungaree itself. Most reference books say that blue jean is an face corruption of the French serge de Nimes a serge stuff from the town of Nimes in France. However, roughly scholars have begun to head this tradition. thither are a fewer schools of estimation with regard to the derivation of the word blue jean. Pascale Gorguet-Ballesteros, of the Musee de la Mode et du Costume in Paris, has done rough interesting research on two of these issues. A model called serge de Nimes, was known in France prior to the 17th century. At the self very(prenomina l)(prenominal) metre, in that respect was also a theoretical account known in France as nim. Both models were composed partly of wool. Serge de Nimes was also known in England in the lead the end of the 17th century.The question then arises is this fabric imported from France or is it an English fabric bearing the same name? According to Ms. Gorguet-Ballesteros, fabrics which were named for a certain geographic location were often also make elsewhere the name was utilise to lend a certain cachet to the fabric when it was offered for sale. therefore a serge de Nimes purchased in England was precise carely also do in England, and not in Nimes, France. There even remains the question of how the word denim is popularly thought to be descended from the word serge de Nimes.Serge de Nimes was do of silk and wool, but denim has always been make of cotton. What we have here once again, I think, is a relation between fabrics that is in name unless, though two fabrics are a t or dain weave. Is the real origin of the word denim serge de nim, meaning a fabric that resembled the part-wool fabric called nim? Was serge de Nimes more well-known, and was this word mistranslated when it cross the English Channel? Or, did British merchants decide to give a rattling(a) French name to an English fabric to give it a sec more cachet? Its probably we will never unfeignedly know.Then, to confuse things heretofore out more, there also existed, at this same age, most other fabric known as jean. Research on this textile indicates that it was a claptrap a cotton, linen and/or wool blend and that the fustian of Genoa, Italy was called jean here we do see evidence of a fabric creation named from a place of origin. It was apparently quite popular, and imported into England in large quantities during the 16th century. By the end of this period jean was being produced in Lancashire. By the eighteenth century jean c great dealh was make completely of cotton, and used t o make mens fabricing, valued especially for its property of durability even after umteen washings. Denims popularity was also on the rise. It was stronger and more expensive than jean, and though the two fabrics were very similar in other ways, they did have one major balance denim was made of one colored thread and one fresh thread jean was woven of two threads of the same color. despicable across the Atlantic, we find American textile move starting on a small scale at this same time, the late 18th century, mostly as a way to be behave independent from exotic producers (mainly the English). From the very beginning, cotton fabrics were an important component of their product line. A pulverisation in the state of Massachusetts wove both denim and jean. President George works capital toured this mill in 1789 and was worldn the machinery which wove denim, which had both warp and fill of cotton. angiotensin converting enzyme of the beginning printed references to the word de nim in the united States was seen in this same division a Rhode Island forward-lookingspaper reported on the local functioning of denim (among other fabrics). The book The Weavers Draft Book and Clothiers Assistant, promulgated in 1792, contains expert sketches of the weaving methods for a variety of denims. In 1864, an East b to each one in large quantities house advertised that it carried 10 disparate kinds of denim, including sunrise(prenominal) Creek discolor and Madison River Browns. (They sound or else contemporary, dont they?Another fashion model of denim appearing eternally young.) Websters Dictionary of the same course of study contained the word denim, referring to it as a coarse cotton drilling used for overalls, etc. Research shows that jean and denim were two very different fabrics in 19th century America. They also differed in how they were used. In 1849 a New York habiliments creater advertised topcoats, vests or short jackets in chestnut, olive, black , white and blue jean. Fine trousers were offered in blue jean overalls and trousers made for work were offered in blue and fancy denim. Other American advertisements show works men have on habiliments that illustrates this difference in customs duty between jean and denim. Mechanics and painters wore overalls made of blue denim working men in oecumenical (including those not engaged in manual labor) wore more tailored trousers made of jean. Denim, then, seems to have been reserved for work clothe, when both durability and comfort were needed. Jean was a work pause fabric in general, without the added benefits of denim as I just mentioned.In Staple Cotton Fabrics by John Hoye, published in 1942, jean is listed as a cotton serge with warp and woof of the same color, used for overalls, work and sport shirts, doctors and nurses uniforms and as linings for boots and shoes. Of denim, Hoye says, The most important fabric of the work- turn group is denim. Denims are strong and servic eable they are particularly strong in the warp direction, where the fabric is subjected to greater go bad than the filling.Twenty historical period after this was written, the magazine American Fabrics ran an article which stated, If we were to use a human term to describe a textile we might say that denim is an honest fabric substantial, forthright, and unpretentious. So how did this utilitarian and unpretentious fabric amaze the stuff of legends that it is today? And how did heave made out of denim come to be called jeans, when they were not made out of the fabric called jean? One very important causa can be found in the life and work of a Bavarian-born businessman who made his way to Gold Rush San Francisco more than cl eld ago.Levis jeans, of course, are named for the founder of the club that makes them. A lot of muckle over the years have thought that Levi Strauss & antiophthalmic factor Co. was started by a Mr. Levi and a Mr. Strauss or even by the French philosopher /anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss. The virtue is, the racy society was founded by a man born as Loeb Strauss in Bavaria in 1829. He, his mother and two sisters left Ger umpteen an(prenominal) in 1847 and sailed to New York, where Loebs half-brothers were in business selling wholesale dry goods (bolts of cloth, linens, clothing, etc.). For a few years, young Loeb Strauss worked for his brothers, and in 1853 obtained his American citizenship. In that same year, he fixed to make a new start and undertake the hazardous stumble to San Francisco, a city enjoying the benefits of the recent Gold Rush.At age 23, Loeb each opinionated to go into the dry goods business for himself (mayhap thinking that the easiest way to make money during a Gold Rush was to sell supplies to miners), or he was sent there by his brothers, in order to open the westmost Coast branch of the family business. No thing what the reason, San Francisco was the kind of city where people went to reinvent thems elves and their lives, and this proved to be straight for Loeb, who changed his name to Levi sometime around 1850, for which we should be grateful, or else today we would all be weathering Loebs Jeans. We dont know how young Levi Strauss got his business off the ground what his thinking was if he travelled into the gold country in search of customers, because LS&CO. lost virtually all of its records, inventory, and photographs in the great San Francisco earthquake and fire of 1906. This has led to many problems for come with officers, researchers, and certainly those interested in LS&CO.s hi history.Chief of these is digging up the true story of the invention of blue jeans, and separating popular myth from historical reality. For decades, the story ran manage this Levi Strauss arrived in San Francisco, and noticed that miners needed strong, sturdy boxers. So he took some chocolate-brown canvas from the stock of dry goods supplies he brought with him from New York, and had a tailor make a reduplicate of pants. Later, he dyed the fabric blue, then switched to denim, which he imported from Nimes. He got the idea of adding metal rivets to the pants from a tailor in Reno, Nevada, and patented this process in 1873. Luckily, the follow obtained copies of the patent papers for the riveting process a number of years ago so we know that Jacob Davis, the Nevada tailor, did come up with this idea and worked with Levi Strauss to manufacture riveted clothing. However, the brown canvas pants story is really just an hypnotic myth.This story likely arose because evidence had been found of some brown pants made of a heavy material which the company sold in the 19th century. However, historical research done at institutions in the San Francisco scope provides us with the truth within the myth. Levi Strauss was a wholesale dry goods merchant beginning with his arrival in San Francisco in 1853. He sold the harsh dry goods products, including clothing whose manuf acturers are unfortunately unknown to us. Levi worked hard, and acquired a news report for quality products over the next two decades. In 1872 he got a letter from tailor Jacob Davis, who had been making riveted clothing for the miners in the Reno area and who purchased cloth from Levi Strauss & Co.He needed a business partner to help him loaf a patent and begin to manufacture this new sheath of work clothing. Well, Levi knew a good business opportunity when he aphorism one, and in 1873 LS&CO. and Davis accepted a patent for an Improvement in Fastening Pocket-Openings. As soon as the two men got their manufacturing speediness under way, they began to make bulls eye riveted shank overalls (which is the old name for jeans) out of a brown cotton dip, and a blue denim. Its likely that a cope with of these hedge in pants (which survived the 1906 fire) confused early historians of the company, as duck looks and feels like canvas. The denim, however, was true blue. Of cour se, Levi did not dye any brown fabric blue, as the myth has proclaimed, nor did he purchase it from Nimes. Knowing that the riveted pants were going to be everlasting(a) for workwear, its likely he heady to make them out of denim rather than jean for the reasons mentioned earlier denim was what you used when you needed a very sturdy fabric for clothing to be worn by men doing manual labor.The denim for the introductory waist overalls came from the Amoskeag Manufacturing Company in Manchester, New Hampshire, on the East Coast of the United States. This area, known as New England, was the site of the first American textile mills, and by 1873 their fabrics were wellknown and well-made. Amoskeag was incorporated in 1831 and their denim production date to the middle-1860s (this being the time of the American Civil War, the company also manufacture guns for a few years). In 1914 an article about the association between LS&CO. and Amoskeag appeared in the mills own newspaper. It rea d in part, In spite of the many cheaper grades offered in competition, the sale of the Amoskeag denim coif has kept up ascribable in part to the superior denim used in its construction and in part to superior wiliness such as sewing with linen thread, etc.Doubtless the Amoskeag denim has contributed in no small degree to the success of Levi Strauss & Co. and, in return, that concern has contributed in an equal degree to the success of Amoskeag denims, advertising as it does, their superiority over all other denims. At Levi Strauss & Co., the duck and denim waist overalls were proving to be the success that Jacob Davis had predicted. Levi Strauss was now the head of both a dry goods wholesaling and garment manufacturing business. In addition to the waist overalls, the company made jackets and other outer wear out of denim and duck they also branched out into shirts of plain or printed muslin. Levi Strauss died in 1902, at the age of 73.He left his thriving business to his fo ur nephews Jacob, Louis, Abraham and Sigmund privy who helped rebuild the company after the disaster of 1906. The earliest surviving catalogue in the Archives shows a wonderful variety of denim products for sale. indoors a few years, it became obvious to the Stern brothers that they needed a new source of denim. Near the end of the 19th century Amoskeag and other New England mills had begun to experience a slow decline, due to competition from mills in the southern states, higher labor and transportation costs, outdated buildings and equipment and high taxes. The demand for waist overalls was so great that LS&CO. needed a more reliable method of obtaining the fabric they needed. Interestingly, by around 1911 the company had stopped making garments out of cotton duck.Its possible that this was due to customer preference once someone had worn a pair of denim pants, experiencing its strength and comfort and how the denim became more comfortable with both washing he never cut e to wear duck again because with cotton duck, you always feel like youre wearing a tent. By 1915 the company was buying the majority of its denim from Cone Mills, in North Carolina (by 1922 all the denim came from Cone). Founded in 1891, it was the center of denim production in America by the turn of the century. Cone developed the denim which brought Levis jeans their greatest fame during the following decades. By the 1920s, Levis waist overalls were the principal product in mens work pants in the western states. Enter the 1930s when Western movies and the West in general captured the American imagination.Authentic cowboys wearing Levis jeans were elevated to mythic status, and Western clothing became synonymous with a life of independence and rugged individualism. Denim was now associated less often with laborers in general, and more as the fabric of the authentic American as symbolized by John Wayne, Gary Cooper and others. LS&CO. advertising did its part to fuel this cra ze, using the Wests historic preference for denim clothing to advertise Levis waist overalls. Easterners who wanted an authentic cowboy experience headed to the dude ranches of calcium, Arizona, Nevada and other states, where they purchased their first pair of Levis (the products were still only sold West of the Mississippi). They took these garments home to scream their friends and help spread the Western influence to the rest of the country, and even overseas.The 1940s, wartime. American G.I.s took their favored pairs of denim pants overseas guarding them against the inevitable theft of rich items. Back in the States, production of waist overalls went down as the mad materials were needed for the war effort. When the war was over, massive changes in society signalled the end of one era and the beginning of another. Denim pants became less associated with workwear and more associated with the leisure activities of prosperous post-war America. Levi Strauss & Co. began selling its products nationally for the first time in the 1950s. Easterners and Midwesterners finally got the chance to wear real Levis jeans, as opposed to the products made by other manufacturers over the years. This led to many changes, within the company and on the products. Zippers was used in the unblemished waist overalls for the first time in 1954. This was in response to complaints from non-Westerners who didnt like the button fly (the jeans they were used to wearing had zippers).We received similar comments from men who had grown up using a button fly, saying rather rude things about finding a zipper where buttons should be. We did offer both products all over the country, but making changes to peoples favorite pants is always a risk. Some things took longer to change. One of them was the post that denim clothing was appropriate only for hard, physical labor. This was dramatically exhibit to LS&CO. in 1951. Singer Bing Crosby was very fond of Levis jeans and was wearing his favorite pair while on a hunting trip to Canada with a friend in that year. The men tried to check into a Vancouver hotel, but because they were wearing denim, the desk clerk would not give them a populate apparently denim-clad visitors were not considered high-class enough for this hotel. Because the men were wearing Levis jeans, the clerk did not even bother to look past their clothing to see that he was turning away Americas most beloved singer (luckily for Bing, he was finally recognized by the bellhop).LS&CO. heard about this, and created a denim tuxedo jacket for Bing, which we presented to him at a celebration in Elko, Nevada, where Bing was honorary mayor. Interestingly, the day set apart for this special presentation was called Blue Serge solar day not Levis Day or Blue Denim Day. Was the word denim not advanced(a) enough for the organizers of the event (who were not from LS&CO.)? I dont think well ever know the answer to this. The 1950s brought great annunciate to Levis jeans and denim pants in general, though not in the way most company executives would like. The portrayal of denim-clad juvenile delinquents or, as one newspaper put it, motorcycle boys in films and on television during this decade led many school administrators to ban the wearing of denim in the classroom, fearing that the mere presence of denim on a teenagers body would cause him to rebel against authority in all of its forms. about everyone in America had strong opinions about what wearing blue jeans did to young people. For example in 1957 we ran an advertisement in a number of newspapers all over the U.S. which showed a clean-cut young boy wearing Levis jeans. The ad contained the slogan, Right For School. This ad outraged many parents and adults in general. One woman in New Jersey wrote, While I have to admit that this may be right for school in San Francisco, in the west, or in some rural areas I can control you that it is in bad taste and not right for School in t he East and particularly New YorkOf course, you may have different standards and perhaps your employees are permitted to wear Bermuda shorts or golf togs in your office while transacting Levis business Interesting, isnt it, how this woman predicted the prospective trend toward casual clothing in the workplace? But even as some Americans tried to get denim out of the schools, there were just as many who believed that jeans deserved a better reputation, and pointed to the many wholesome young people who wore jeans and never got into trouble.But no matter what anyone thought or did, nothing could stop the ever-increasing demand for Levis jeans. As one 1958 newspaper article reported, about 90% of American youths wear jeans everywhere except in bed and in church and that this is true in most sections of the country. Events in this decade also led the company to change the name of its most popular product. Until the 1950s we referred to the famous copper riveted pants as overalls when y ou went into a small clothing store and asked for a pair of overalls, you were given a pair of Levis. However, after humanity War II our customer base changed dramatically, as referred to earlier from working adult men, to leisure-loving teenage boys and their older college-age brothers. These guys called the product jeans and by 1960 LS&CO. decided that it was time to adopt the name, since these new, young consumers had adopted our products. Now how did the word jeans come to mean pants made out of denim?There are two schools of thought on this one. The word might be a derivation of Genoese, meaning the type of pants worn by sailors from Genoa, Italy. There is another explanation jean and denim fabrics were both used for workwear for many decades, and jeans pants was a common term for an article of clothing made from jean fabric Levi Strauss himself imported jeans pants from the Eastern part of the United States to sell in California. When the popularity of jean gave way to th e even greater popularity of denim for workwear, the word jeans seemed to get stuck with the denim version of these pants. Certainly the word jeans has been used to describe any type of pant made out of denim, and not just the riveted, indestructible, working-mans pants originated by Levi Strauss & Co. in 1873. We even called some lightweight denim Western Wear pants in the 1940s jeans. But until Americas youth decided what jeans meant to them, we stuck with the classic moniker overalls. From the 1950s to the present, denim and jeans have been associated with youth, with new ideas, with rebellion, with individuality.College-age men and women entered American colleges in the 1960s and, wearing their favorite pants (jeans, of course), they began to protest against the accessible ills plaguing the United States. Denim acquired a bad reputation yet again, and for the same reasons as it had a decade earlier those who protest, those who rebel, those who question authority, traditional institutions and customs, wear denim. Beginning in the late 1950s, Levi Strauss & Co. began to look at opportunities for elaborateness outside of the United States. During and after World War II, people in Japan, England and Germany saw Levis jeans for the first time, as they were worn by U.S. soldiers during their off-duty hours. There are letters in the company Archives from people who traded strap jackets and other clothing items to American G.I.s for their Levis jeans, and wrote to the company asking how they could get another pair. Word began to spread via individual customers, and American magazines which made their way overseas.Letters came to us from places as diverse as Thailand, England and Pitcairn Island in the southeast Pacific, written by people begging us to send them a pair of the famous jeans. British teenagers would swarm the docks when American Merchant maritime ships came into port, and buy the Levis jeans off the men before they even had time to set foot on dry land. By the late 1960s, the carry of jeans into Europe and Asia had become a flood. Denim was poised to re-enter the clean which had given it birth, and it would be adopted with an enthusiasm shown to few other American products. Indeed, despite its European origins, denim was considered the quintessential American fabric, beginning even in the mid-1960s, when jeans were still a new commodity in Europe. We entered the Nipponese market a few years later. One writer wrote prophetically in 1964 Throughout the industrialized world denim has become a symbol of the young, active, informal, American way of life. It is equally symbolic of Americas achievements in mass production, for denim of uniform quality and superior performance is turned out by the mile in some of Americas biggest and most modern mills.Moreover, what was once a fabric only for work clothes, has now also become an important fabric for correspond clothes, for sportswear of all types. By the 1970s, these play clothes tended toward the flared and bell puke silhouette. At the same time, new fabrics were used for products that had traditionally been made out of denim. The product line of Levi Strauss & Co. was no exception. Blue Levis were still a staple of the companys collection, but a glance at sales catalogs will reveal that customers also wanted plaid, polyester, no-wrinkle flares with twinned vests. What looked almost like the end of simple, cotton denim as the fabric of everyday wear, was merely a pause in denims continued ascension to global dominion. A closer look will show that denim never really disappeared.Even in the 1970s, when it seemed that denim was being pushed aside in favor of these other fabrics, writers, manufacturers, and marketing executives worked hard to keep denim in the public eye. A writer in the Fall 1970 issue of American Fabrics said, Indigo Blue Denimhas become a phenomenon without parallel in our times. To the youth of this country, and many other co untries in this shrinking world, Indigo Blue Denim does not stand for utility. Its the worlds top fashion fabric for pants. By the mid to late 1970s the craze for doubleknits and other like fabrics began to slow. At the same time, marketing reports in various trade magazines showed an upward surge in the popularity of denim, as seen in the number of denim-clad models in print and television advertising. Those who followed clothing trends into the late 1970s were quoted in the trade papers with comments such as, Jeans are more than a make.They are an established attitude about clothes and lifestyle. This attitude could be seen very clearly in the decorated denim craze which saw beaded, embroidered, painted and sequined jeans appearing on streets from California to New York and across the ocean. Personalizing ones jeans was such a extensive trend in the United States that Levi Strauss & Co. sponsored a Denim artwork Contest in 1973, inviting customers to send us slides of their d ecorated denim. The company received 2,000 entries from 49 of the United States, as well as Canada and the Bahamas. Judges include photographer Imogen Cunningham, designer Rudi Gernreich, the art critic for the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper, and the Curator for San Franciscos De Young Museum.The winning garments were sent on an 18month tour of American museums, and some of them were purchased by LS&CO. for the company Archives. In the Introduction to the catalog published to accompany the museum tour, contest coordinators wrote that Levis jeans had become a canvas for personal expression. Personal expression found another medium in the mid-eighties with the designer jean craze of that decade. It seems you cant keep a good fabric down, no matter what form it takes. We all entertain the ways in which denim was molded onto our bodies and the way that jeans were now worn almost anywhere, including places where they would have been completed banned in previous years (such as ups cale restaurants).A writer for American Fabrics predicted this trend all the way back in 1969, when he wrote, What has happened to denim in the dying decade is really a capsule of what happened to America. It has climbed the ladder of taste. Today, LS&CO. employees wear Levis jeans to work. Looking back, we see that the very first people to wear Levis jeans worked with pick and shovel, and though our tools are computer keyboard, PDA and kiosk phone, we have both been moved to wear the same thing each and every work day denim jeans. Born in Europe, denims function and adaptable form found a perfect home in untamed America with the invention of jeans then, as now, denim makes our lives easier by making us comfortable and gives us a dwarfish bit of history every time we put it on.