In Dino Compagnis diatribe of the Florentine demise, it is clear that he believes the native strife among her citizens was the backbone of a beautiful urban centers undoing. Contemporaries who experience read Machiavellis works, with spell pop a watchmly grasp of Italian intent at his time, tend to figure Machiavelli a cruel and unmerciful man. Comparing Machiavellis images and beliefs on the subject of human nature with that of Compagni, stock-still, lead to a real converging view of mankind. As Compagni disserts, he believes the citizens of Florence to be as much(prenominal)(prenominal) offensive and duplistic. Thus, the wicked citizens and wicked deeds were the main font of be, coupled with the universal the true that men of different classes have different policy-making and economical agendas. Compagnis fault however lies in his hold in view and perspective. As a citizen at the time his penning concerns, he has tunnel vision which young historians to day do not. Compagni has not felt the rule of an direct monarch wish other Europeans of his time, nor was he brought up in a character reference of medieval Europe where agent was thought to radiate downward, from God, to the clergy, and tail fin on the wholey to the king or emperor. In the communes that Compagni inhabited, might radiated upwardly from the popolo to its leaders. Compagnis belief that bad politics caused Florentine disagreement was true, exactly when the guilt is misplaced on coddle and ir trusty leaders, rather than a flawed political system. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â though Italian communes were extremely patriotic and incredibly loyal, they were wrent apart by upcountry dissent. If a commune was threatened by an after-school(prenominal) hurtle they would mobilely ban together. However, in times of calmness they were quick to quarrel with each other. Internal division is basic exclusivelyy the internal history of Italian communes. Compagni d etests both the Guelf and Ghibelline parties! as he states in chapter three of his first book. While both parties were below a cloak of peace, the Guelfs, who were the more respectable party, slowly but for certain began to contravene the peace pacts, leading to growing discord. These events differentiate in motion what Compagni asserts divided the Florentines and caused internal strife. Compagni was member of the general party, and thereof was not in favor of the tycoon the Guelfs were usurping. Furthermore, he was touch that the weak would be oppressed by the cryptical and effectual, frankincense the arrangement with the Priors of the Guilds was very beneficial to the popolo. This situation had an unfavorable rear however, as the citizens who held power were quickly corrupted. In humanitarian they overly sought to plunder the wealth of the commune, so it flush smoke be noted that there is con expressionrable evidence each(prenominal) around Compagni leading to his belief that men argon wicked. Com pagni evil the powerful citizens, labeled magnates, to a fault stems from the attempt to win the locating of the Pope and to crush the popolo. Compagni could alone believe that mankind was extremely fickle and corrupt, as he gives proof with his tell of how the popolo bend against the podesta. The podesta found himself in much(prenominal)(prenominal) a predicament because he had been deceived by a Florentine judge who had the notary blame messer Simone, rather than the guilty messer Corso. To the Florentine popolo, all the holders of power on with the enforcers of justice, must(prenominal) have been viewed duplistic villains. By examining Compagnis writing, one quarter see that he too must have shared the said(prenominal) train of thought. Further proof, as Compagni gives it, can be found in his description of how Giano left the city on the wrong advice of his relatives, the Magalottis, only to be banished while his goods and his person were condemned. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Florentine discord, as seen by Compa! gni, is therefore the essential shadow imbued in her citizens. exercise set this argument is a six day fulfilment of rebellion in which the B privations caused total chaos: The men who feared their foes hid themselves in their friends houses. One enemy attacked the other; houses were set afire, robberies were committed, and belongings fled from the homes of the powerless. The powerful B overleaps extorted money from the Whites; they married young girls by force; they killed men. With such doings happening all around Compagni, it can also be determined that Compagni believed that men gained and became great from evil deeds. Compagni witnessed the going of his city in a time where kinship and familiarity meant nothing, nor could pity, accord, or mercy be found in anyone. These unmerciful events and malicious acts are the very one which imbued Compagni with the notion all men are wicked as well as duplistic. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Although Compagni may give a quite acc urate historic account of events, because he was a citizen at the time, his writing must be considered biased.
Waley places much more fault on the lack of a solidified government and on the lack of a type of person called a burgher. This is significant because landowners were the people accountable for most Italian politics. This was a major cause of discord between the magnates and the communes, a point of discord that Compagni fails to give flat coat for. In addition to the aforementioned problems, there was always a power struggle between ecclesiastical control, and those who opposed it. Florentines were for the la rge part able to resist this only because such a high! percentage of her citizens were involved in government. Power was essentially handed out without limiting soundbox that could keep them in check, and as shown by both Compagni and Waley, power corrupts. Compagni, as a member of the popolo, would also be in favor of her rule of the communes, but he fails to point out as Waley does, that communes were essentially set up as a counter-balance to the rich and powerful enabling the popolo to check the power of the magnates if such a crisis arose. Compagnis fault is therefore his own check view and lack of first hand knowledge to the highest layer other forms of government prevalent throughout the rest of Europe. Compagnis political wishes could not be possible in a society with so much discord and lack of a firm social and political structure. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â There were many reasons for the political turmoil of Florence, but the importance of this essay is pointing out that Compagni views the vileness of men to be at th e forefront of Florentine discord. Compagni, however, grew up and lived in a world where one could come to these conclusions without a better grasp of universal politics. Even if he knew of such things, he had never experienced such rule and he himself was a member of the popolo, trying as hard as anyone to have their share of power. He would place blame on the nobles, foreigners and commoners, stating that they have destroyed a beautiful city. These are Compagnis beliefs, and even if they are biased and perhaps somewhat ignorant, they are of importance to the matter at hand. The intrinsic wickedness and finesse of men, as Compagni describes, was the backbone of Florentine discord. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
